We believe staff training is only worth doing if it delivers measurable results. This calculator helps you tie training costs back to real performance outcomes β so you, your boss, or whoever signs off the spend can see exactly what good training is worth.
Training is too often treated as a line-item expense rather than an investment. Good training β the kind that's structured, reinforced, and tied to real outcomes β should pay for itself many times over. This calculator helps you see exactly what that looks like in dollars.
Anyone considering staff training β whether you've been asked to organise it, you need to make a case to your boss, finance, or the owner, or you ARE the boss and want to know if it's worth it. You don't need to be a finance person to use this.
A clear picture of what current performance gaps are costing you, what a structured training programme could realistically return, and a downloadable PDF business case you can share with anyone who needs to sign off the spend.
About 3 minutes. Six short steps. You can use rough estimates throughout β every number is editable, and you'll see exactly how each assumption affects the result so you can stress-test it.
Pick the option that best matches your situation. The calculator will tailor the questions and the financial model accordingly.
A few basics about the people you're considering training.
Tell us what's happening today. Use rough estimates if you don't have exact numbers β the defaults are reasonable starting points.
These are just starting assumptions β you'll be able to adjust every metric individually on the next page. Pick whichever feels closest to what your team could realistically achieve from training.
Adjust the sliders below to model your own assumptions. Each slider shows its dollar impact in real time. The presets at the top reset all sliders to a starting point.
Based on your scenario, here are the most relevant CX Skills training categories.
Download the PDF or have it emailed to you β ready to send to your manager, finance, or executive sponsor.